justicedonedirtcheap@gmail.com



 




Representations of the Lady of Justice in the Western tradition occur in many places and at many times. She sometimes wears a blindfold, more so in Europe, but more often she appears without one. She usually carries a sword and scales. Almost always draped in flowing robes, mature but not old, no longer commonly known as Themis, she symbolizes the fair and equal administration of the law, without corruption, avarice, prejudice, or favor.


CLICK ON HEREIN BELOW PROVIDED: LAW SCHOOL BOOK IMAGES, SIMPLY SELECT THE SUBJECT OF YOUR INTEREST AND ENTER OUR HUMBLE LAW LIBRARY; THIS IS A CHRONOLOGICAL ARRANGEMENT OF OUR MERITORIOUSLY RESEARCHED TORT LAW (TO REDRESS A WRONG DONE) THEN LISTED A DETAILED ACCOUNT OF THE PRACTICAL EXPERIENCES OF OUR CONTRIBUTING SELF REPRESENTED LITIGANT'S, CONCERNING:
the study, theory and practice of litigation
as it relates to The Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick, Provincial Court and The Court of Appeal of New Brunswick; Filing, and Procedure, in general.















       Please find - here below - this Link: My Brief Story - Introduction: Welcome, this is a 'Justice' Blog intended to benefit all;   'Self Represented Litigants'.


=================================================================================================

2013 New Year's Resolution:
To however, cause the Judiciary of New Brunswick to uphold the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Reason being, that, the Charter is applicable in New Brunswick, just as all provinces are bound by the Constitution.
Despite the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was adopted in 1982, it was not until 1985, that, the main provisions regarding equality rights (section 15) came into effect. The delay was meant to give the federal and provincial governments an opportunity to review per-existing statutes and strike potentially unconstitutional inequalities.

=================================================================================================

NOTICE: above provided image is a link to the 'RANT' area of contributing Self Represented Litigants
========================================
=========================================================


Welcome, this is a 'Justice' Blog intended to benefit all;

'Self Represented Litigants'. follow this link to New Brunswick Legal Procedure 101

NOTICE: above provided image is a link to the 'Public Forum regarding our legal and judicial system


NOTICE: above provided image is a link to the 'RANT' area of contributing Self Represented Litigants

Back to Justice Done Dirt Cheap Front Page

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

September 26, 2012 Hearing of an Application to Challenge the Jurisdiction of the Court, regarding City of Fredericton Bylaw matter of not wearing a helmet and a Court appearance.





September 26, 2012 Hearing of an Application to Challenge the Jurisdiction of the Court, regarding  City of Fredericton Bylaw matter of not wearing a helmet and a Court appearance.

For your information THE GROUNDS FOR THIS APPLICATION by way of Special Appearance to challenge jurisdiction ARE:

The Law
Provincial Offences Procedure Act, SNB 1987, c P-22.1
1. Courts must presume that a legislature says in a statute what it means and means in a statute what it says there.

2. Every part of an act is presumed to be of some effect and is not to be treated as meaningless unless absolutely necessary

3. Maxim: The meaning of words is the spirit of the law.

4. According to section 12(2) of Provincial Offences Procedure Act, SNB 1987, c P-22.1, proceedings in respect of the offence charged in the ticket (procedures), commence when the notice of prosecution is filed with the judge.

5. According to section 12(1) of Provincial Offences Procedure Act, SNB 1987, c P-22.1, unless payment of a fixed penalty is made in accordance with section 14 within the time stated in the ticket, the notice of prosecution shall be filed with a judge no later than the date stated in the ticket for the defendant's appearance.

6. According to section 16(1) of Provincial Offences Procedure Act, SNB 1987, c P-22.1, where the defendant has not paid a fixed penalty before the time stated in the ticket for the payment of the fixed penalty and does not appear in court at the time and place stated in the ticket, the judge shall examine the notice of prosecution and, if the notice of prosecution contains the certificate referred to in subsection (2), the judge shall, subject to subsection (3), convict the defendant and impose a fine in the amount of the fixed penalty set out in the ticket.

7. According to section 16(2) of Provincial Offences Procedure Act, SNB 1987, c P-22.1, the certificate on a notice of prosecution shall be in prescribed form, shall be signed, and shall state (a) that the person signing the certificate delivered personally to the defendant the ticket to which the notice of prosecution corresponds, and (b) that the ticket was in prescribed form and was completed in the same manner as the notice of prosecution.

8. According to section 16(3) of Provincial Offences Procedure Act, SNB 1987, c P-22.1, the judge shall not convict the defendant if (a) the judge has reason to believe that the certificate on the notice of prosecution is inaccurate, or (b) the notice of prosecution contains a defect and the defect cannot be cured under section 106.

9. According to section 106(5) of Provincial Offences Procedure Act, SNB 1987, c P-22.1, no curing of a defect under subsection (4) shall be permitted if (a) the defect was such as to mislead the defendant, (b) substantial injustice would be caused to the defendant by curing the defect, and(c)the injustice that would be caused to the defendant by curing the defect cannot be overcome by the granting of an adjournment.

10. As a result pursuant to and according to section 106(5) - Filing an information instead of a the notice of prosecution would (1) mislead the defendant (2) substantial injustice would be caused if the court overlooks  the fact that no notice of prosecution was issued at the time of the ticket being served, notice of prosecution  was not filled according to the Act in prescribed form and the notice of prosecution was never filled with the Court before the date of the first appearance (August 15, 2012) as required by section 12(1) of Provincial Offences Procedure Act, SNB 1987, c P-22.1, consequentially (c) the injustice that would be caused to the defendant by curing the defect cannot be overcome by the granting of an adjournment.


The relevant submitted Provincial Court documents are:

Sept 25, 2012 Brief arguing the Application Challenging Jurisdiction

Sept 25, 2012 Application FORM 1 - Challenging Jurisdiction

Sept 25, 2012 Affidavit in Support of Application Challenging Jurisdiction



 Because of all the above the Court has lost Jurisdiction and should immediately dismiss the matter for want of jurisdiction. 

No comments: